Strengthening Justice or Delivering Injustice: The ChatGPT Jurisprudence

Justice is the bedrock of a civilized society. When justice is dispensed in a fair and impartial manner, it strengthens the fabric of society. However, when justice is compromised, it can destroy the very essence of society. The ChatGPT jurisprudence is a prime example of how the use of artificial intelligence in the legal system can have both positive and negative implications.

ChatGPT is an AI chatbot that has been developed to assist judges in delivering verdicts in minor court cases. The AI has been trained to analyse legal precedents and provide recommendations to judges. The chatbot is hailed as a means of streamlining the legal process and reducing the backlog of cases in the courts.

The use of AI in the legal system has been successful in several countries, with the UK being one of the pioneers in this field. However, the chatbot has not been without its controversies. Critics argue that the use of AI in the legal system could lead to unintended consequences and undermine the very notion of justice.

Consider the case of the US state of Wisconsin. In 2019, a man was sentenced to six years in prison based on a recommendation made by an AI algorithm. The man was accused of a range of crimes, including battery and false imprisonment. However, the algorithm used to determine his sentence was found to be biased against African Americans, and the man in question was African American. This case highlights the dangers of relying solely on AI in the legal system.

While the use of AI in the legal system can help streamline the process and reduce the backlog of cases, it must be used judiciously. It is essential to ensure that the use of AI does not compromise the fundamental principle of justice. Here are some practical steps that can be taken to ensure that AI is used responsibly in the legal system:

• Transparency: AI algorithms used in the legal system should be transparent. Judges and other legal professionals must be able to understand how the algorithms work and how they arrive at their recommendations. Transparency is essential to ensure that the use of AI does not result in unintended consequences.
• Accountability: There must be mechanisms in place to hold those responsible accountable for the decisions made based on AI recommendations. The use of AI in the legal system should not provide a shield for those who make unjust decisions.
• Diversity: When training AI algorithms, it is crucial to ensure that the data sets used are diverse. This will help eliminate any biases that may be present in the data. It is also important to ensure that those developing the algorithms come from diverse backgrounds.

In conclusion, the use of AI in the legal system is a double-edged sword. While it can help streamline the process and reduce the backlog of cases, it must be used judiciously. It is essential to ensure that the use of AI does not compromise the fundamental principle of justice. By following the three practical steps outlined above, the use of AI in the legal system can be both effective and just.