On Sunday, August 8, 2021 Laird faced a two-match suspension after being charged by the MRO Adelaide Football Club for rough conduct against his opponent. This charge sparked debate among football fans and professionals alike. While some believe that Laird's actions were an acceptable part of the game, others argue that such conduct should be punished to discourage aggression and protect players.
In a game against Western Bulldogs, Laird was involved in a physical altercation with his opponent. In the third quarter, Laird pushed his opponent away with his forearm and then landed a punch on his chest. The punch was not recorded by the umpire at the time, but it was captured by the match footage.
The MRO Adelaide Football Club reviewed the incident and charged Laird with rough conduct. This charge carries a base sanction of two matches, which means that Laird will miss two games if he accepts the charge or three games if he contests it and loses.
The charge against Laird has ignited a debate about whether such physical conduct should be accepted in football or whether it should be punished to protect players from injury and discourage aggression.
Those who argue for acceptance of physical conduct in football believe that it is an essential part of the game and adds excitement and drama to the match. They argue that the players are aware of the risks and are willing to take them for the sake of the sport.
However, those who argue against physical conduct believe that it is unfair and dangerous. They argue that it puts players at risk of injury and that it can lead to long-term health problems. They also believe that it sends the wrong message to young people who look up to football players as role models.
The following examples illustrate the consequences of rough conduct in football:
Based on the above incident and the debate, the following conclusions can be drawn:
Curated by Team Akash.Mittal.Blog
Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn