As a high school student in Seattle, Sarah used ChatGPT to make new friends, discuss homework, and share memes. Like many of her peers, she found the platform convenient and engaging. However, this may soon change, as Seattle recently announced that it plans to ban students from using ChatGPT during school hours. While the intention is to prevent distraction and cyberbullying, some experts argue that the ban is unlikely to achieve its goals.
One reason why the ban may not work is that it fails to account for the diversity of students' needs and preferences. For instance, some students use ChatGPT to cope with mental health issues, such as anxiety and depression. According to a survey conducted by the American Psychological Association in 2018, 76% of teens say that mental health is a significant issue for people their age. By prohibiting access to ChatGPT, schools may inadvertently deprive students of a vital resource for social support and stress relief. This is especially concerning given the current pandemic, which has disrupted students' routines and increased their isolation.
Another challenge with the ban is that it may drive students towards less safe and private platforms. As ChatGPT co-founder, Jack Smith, points out, "Banning something doesn't stop it from happening; it just drives it underground where it's harder to monitor and regulate." Indeed, there are many alternative chat apps and social media sites that are not as secure or moderated as ChatGPT. By forcing students to find new ways to communicate online, the ban may expose them to more risks, such as cyberbullying, harassment, and predators. In other words, the cure may be worse than the disease.
It's worth noting that ChatGPT is not the only platform that Seattle wants to ban. Other apps and websites that would be included under the ban include Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. While these companies have policies and tools to prevent harmful behavior, such as blocking and reporting users, they cannot guarantee complete safety and privacy. Moreover, they may have unintended consequences, such as reinforcing social hierarchies and norms.
Overall, the debate around Seattle's ban on ChatGPT highlights the complex trade-offs between safety and freedom. While schools have a legitimate interest in protecting their students from harm, they also have a responsibility to foster their growth, creativity, and social skills. By banning ChatGPT, Seattle risks sending a message that it does not trust or respect its students' judgment and autonomy. Instead of prohibiting access to ChatGPT, schools could consider educating and empowering students to use it responsibly and respectfully.
References:
Further Reading:
Akash Mittal Tech Article
Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn